info@ijwghh.com +1 234 567 890
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##
HomeAbout the JournalPeer Review Process

Peer Review Process

A fair, transparent, and academically sound review process ensuring the highest standards of research quality.

The International Journal of World Geography and Human History has a rigorous peer review process to ensure the research published in the journal is relevant, original and of academic quality. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are thoroughly reviewed prior to a final decision on publication.

1 Initial Editorial Screening

After the submission of a manuscript, the editorial team reviews the manuscript to determine if it is within the scope of the journal and has the basic manuscript requirements. The manuscript might also be subjected to originality, plagiarism, formatting and general academic standards check.

2 Reviewer Selection

Manuscripts which survive the initial screening are then forwarded to an appropriate reviewer who has the knowledge and expertise in the content area. The reviewers are appointed according to their academic experience and expertise on the research's topic.

3 Peer Review

The journal is double blind peer reviewed: The name of author and reviewers are not disclosed during the review. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript with regard to its originality, research method, clarity and scientific contribution, accuracy and quality.

4 Reviewer Recommendations

Based on the manuscript, reviewers can make any of the following recommendations:

  • Accept the manuscript
  • Accept with minor revisions
  • Revise and resubmit with major revisions
  • Reject the manuscript

Authors may be asked to revise their manuscript based on the reviewers' comments. The revised manuscript should address the suggestions and concerns raised during the review process.

5 Editorial Decision

The editor(s) decide(s) on the final acceptance of the article based on the reviewer's recommendations, the overall quality of the manuscript. When relevant, the decision is conveyed to the corresponding author together with the comments from the reviewers.

6 Revision and Re-Review

If revision is requested, authors will be provided with revision within the specified time. If there is a significant revision, the revised manuscript can be returned to the reviewers for additional evaluation prior to decision.

7 Confidentiality and Ethical Review

Manuscripts and reviewers' reports remain confidential throughout the process of review. Reviewers are expected to give objective and constructive criticism and should indicate if they have a potential conflict of interest that might be construed to influence their evaluation.

8 Publication

Manuscripts that pass the peer review and editorial process are accepted for publication. The final version is written for publication once the appropriate editing and formatting have been done.